Try our new intelligent model routing solution, Arcee Conductor. Sign up today and get a $200 credit (~400M free tokens).
Market Intelligence
Learn how AI model routing solves key challenges in AI adoption by cutting costs, improving performance, and simplifying model selection. Discover how businesses use routing to deploy the right model for every task.
With AI adoption accelerating across industries, companies can choose from a diverse selection of AI models to power their work. These include large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4o and Claude-3.7-Sonnet, small language models (SLMs) like Virtuoso-Large and Arcee-Blitz, and specialized reasoning models like DeepSeek R1. These well-known AI models represent just a fraction of the available options.
It's an incredible abundance of choices—but does all that choice actually benefit users?
Not necessarily.
We've observed significant challenges in real-world AI implementations. For instance, it's wasteful to deploy powerful LLMs for straightforward work. Let's say you have a marketing team that has become adept at using AI for tasks like customer data categorization and keyword extraction. AI is boosting the team's efficiency and accuracy–but they're most likely using advanced LLMs when smaller, less expensive AI models would perform equally well.
This is just one example of how over-use of premium AI models can drive up costs.
In this blog, we'll examine the key challenges people face when implementing AI models, and explore how model routing offers a solution by intelligently selecting the optimal model for each specific task—balancing performance requirements with cost efficiency.
Many companies have trouble using AI because they can't always use the best model for their needs. As more companies use AI, they face three big challenges:
As AI adoption increases, costs don't just grow—they scale faster than the value that AI generates. Many companies rely on a single large model for all tasks, resulting in excessive computing requirements and inefficient spending patterns.
Cloud expenses have emerged as a critical factor impacting companies' financial performance. In 2023, global cloud spending exceeded $500 billion and is forecast to reach $675 billion in 2024. This burden falls heavily on SaaS companies, where 73% report that cloud costs consume at least 6% of their revenue, with nearly a third spending over 11%. The computational demands of sophisticated AI models further intensify cloud resource consumption, substantially escalating operational costs.
The financial challenges extend beyond standard cloud services. Large AI models require extensive infrastructure investments, with self-hosting high-performance systems costing upwards of $27,000 monthly. Without strategic optimization approaches, these combined expenses can make meaningful AI adoption financially unsustainable for many organizations.
Additionally, relying solely on large AI models creates inefficiencies for simpler tasks. When processing straightforward requests, organizations waste resources by deploying sophisticated models where smaller, specialized models would suffice. For instance, compact language models like Arcee Blitz can handle simple prompts at approximately 200 times lower cost than premium models like Claude-3.7-Sonnet, representing substantial savings opportunities that many companies currently overlook.
In short, AI costs are growing faster than their delivered value, creating financial strain through rising cloud expenses and infrastructure investments. Companies typically waste resources by using powerful models unnecessarily for simple tasks.
AI models don't perform equally across all tasks. Many businesses assume that one powerful model can handle everything, but in reality, performance varies based on the task, data, and context. Such performance disparities can impact business outcomes. Understanding these inconsistencies is crucial for developing effective AI strategies.
For example, when a general-purpose large language model analyzes SEC filings without specialized financial training, it may misinterpret regulatory clauses or miss critical compliance nuances, potentially leading to flawed risk assessments. Conversely, a specialized model fine-tuned exclusively for financial regulation might excel with SEC documents but fail completely when tasked with generating complex code for an unrelated software project.
The inconsistency problem extends beyond simple task categorization. Even within similar task types, performance can fluctuate based on subtle contextual differences, data representation, or the specific framing of problems. This creates challenges for organizations attempting to standardize AI implementation across departments or use cases.
The AI ecosystem now offers varying performance profiles across different domains. For coding tasks, Claude-Sonnet might deliver superior results, while image generation might work best with GPT-4o, and complex reasoning could benefit from DeepSeek R1. This performance variation creates a fundamental dilemma: how can you or your organization leverage the right model for each specific need without creating operational bottlenecks?
At the individual level, it's simply impossible to test every available model for each specific task. The cognitive load of researching, evaluating, and selecting the optimal model creates significant friction in workflows. Even when making a selection, there's often a lingering sense of FOMO–with users wondering if perhaps another model might perform better in subtle ways.
As adoption scales from individuals to teams and organizations, these challenges compound exponentially. Teams face significant workflow disruptions from both the cognitive burden of model selection decisions and the technical complexity of maintaining multiple integrations. What begins as an individual's challenge of selecting the right tool quickly evolves into an organizational problem of standardization, integration, and governance.
Specifically, implementing multiple AI models requires managing different infrastructure configurations, API integrations, and maintenance protocols for each model. This diversity creates fragmented systems that resist cohesive management. When teams attempt to incorporate these various models into existing workflows, they inevitably encounter compatibility issues and deployment bottlenecks that slow implementation and drive up operational costs.
Governance challenges further compound these complexities. Without centralized oversight, organizations operate without visibility into which models are being deployed for specific tasks across different teams. This lack of transparency prevents the implementation of consistent performance standards and compliance protocols. As teams independently select models based on immediate needs, organizational blind spots emerge, leading to inconsistent decision-making and missed optimization opportunities.
Humans should do human things. The true promise of artificial intelligence lies in its ability to amplify our natural strengths, not in creating new administrative burdens that have us serving technology instead of technology serving us. In this section, we'll demonstrate how intelligent model routing can address these challenges, enabling people to harness AI's full potential without the associated management overhead.
Model routing reduces costs by intelligently assigning each task to its most suitable model, avoiding the default use of expensive large language models for all requests. With a diverse pool of models managed through intelligent routing, companies can significantly lower AI model usage costs by matching tasks precisely with more cost-efficient models that still deliver accurate results. This strategic approach ensures optimal performance while eliminating the waste of sending simple prompts to unnecessarily powerful and expensive models.
While many LLM routers currently focus on directing traffic between various large language models, Arcee AI takes this concept further by including small language models in the routing options. This expanded approach creates additional opportunities for cost reduction, particularly for straightforward tasks that don't require the full capabilities of larger models.
Arcee Conductor dynamically routes each task to the most appropriate AI model in its ecosystem, leveraging large language models for complex, reasoning-intensive queries while directing simpler, more straightforward tasks to small language models that can handle them effectively at a fraction of the cost.
For example, a customer support system handling password reset requests does not need a large, expensive AI model to process a straightforward, rule-based query. Instead, a lightweight model can handle the request efficiently. More complex issues, such as troubleshooting account access errors, can be escalated to a higher-powered AI model that provides deeper analysis and personalized solutions.
With Arcee AI’s model routing, businesses have achieved a 64% cost reduction compared to traditional single-model approaches.
By dynamically selecting the right model based on task complexity, companies can:
Rather than relying on a single AI model for all tasks, model routing strategically matches each request with its optimal AI model. This approach ensures appropriate model allocation based on task requirements.
With an effective routing system and access to diverse models like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, and DeepSeek R1, organizations can direct each request to the most suitable model for consistent, high-quality outputs.
As you can see, the effectiveness of model routing depends on two critical components: a sophisticated router with deep task understanding and access to a comprehensive selection of AI models.
Arcee Conductor addresses both requirements simultaneously. Our platform offers a comprehensive range of model choices, spanning from large language models to small language models. Using our proven model training pipeline and innovative frameworks—including HuggingGPT, ModernBert, and Mixture of Domain Expert Models (MoDEM)—we've built an ultra-lightweight (150M parameter), low-latency routing model that deeply understands inputs based on domain, task complexity, and specific requirements.
For example, when processing coding tasks, depending on the complexity, Arcee Conductor may route your prompt to our specialized coding model, Coder, ensuring that programming work is handled by a model specifically optimized for code generation and understanding. For marketing copy generation, it may instead route to Arcee Blitz. Each assignment ensures consistent performance and output quality, regardless of which specific model processes the request.
This targeted approach ensures:
Model routing significantly simplifies AI integration by automating model selection and deployment across an organization's infrastructure. Instead of manually configuring each model or making repeated selection decisions, businesses can directly leverage the power of multiple models through intelligent routing.
The Arcee Conductor API uses an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, making it straightforward to integrate into current applications without requiring developers to rewrite existing code or learn new integration patterns. This compatibility ensures a smooth transition to model routing with minimal technical overhead.
The added advantage is that routing platforms provide businesses with enhanced control and visibility over their AI workflows by clearly showing which tasks are assigned to which models, supported by built-in monitoring and feedback mechanisms.
With Arcee Conductor, you always receive transparent explanations for model selection decisions, giving you insight into the reasoning behind each routing choice.
This enables teams to:
AI model routing helps businesses manage costs, enhance performance, and scale AI effectively. Using a single model for every task often leads to rising expenses and inconsistent results. By selecting the best model for each task, companies can simplify AI workflows and maintain accuracy and financial sustainability.
Arcee AI’s model routing system takes the guesswork out of AI model selection. With automated routing, cost-efficient AI deployment, and seamless integration, Arcee AI helps businesses:
Ready to take back control of your AI costs and performance? Book a demo today to discover how Arcee can improve your AI strategy.
AI model routing dynamically assigns tasks to the most suitable AI model based on factors like cost, speed, and accuracy. This prevents over-reliance on a single model, improves efficiency, and reduces operational costs.
Yes. Model routing integrates with existing workflows, requiring no infrastructure overhaul.
Implementation time depends on the complexity of the AI stack. However, many businesses can deploy model routing within weeks, especially when using an automated system that streamlines integration.
Yes. While model routing is commonly used in enterprise settings, smaller businesses can also benefit by reducing AI costs and improving performance without needing extensive in-house AI expertise.
Here at Arcee AI, we're the pioneers of training performant and efficient LLMs with Model Merging... And now we bring you *yet another* cutting-edge technique that also dramatically optimizes your training and improves your models.
Arcee is excited to exit stealth with an open core to contextualize domain adapted language models (DALMs).
In the rapidly evolving landscape of Generative AI, the quest for more refined and contextually aware language models has led to our development of the Domain Adapted Language Model System (DALM). This innovation promises to reshape how enterprises harness the power of language models tailored to their specific domains.
Subscribe to our newsletter
.svg)
